January 2021 - Page 50 of 98 - Dr. Ware Technology Services

Log Analytics UI – New experience for Agents Configuration

by Contributed | Jan 18, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Intro

We continue to improve our experiences!
The Agents configuration previously under ‘data’ in Advanced settings is getting a new and improved UI.

The new Agents configuration blade

We have added a new entry point for Agents Configuration under the “Settings” section in Log Analytics Workspace context:

The new experience for Agents configuration features a modern new look and feel and is designed to provide a better experience for configuration:

Feedback

We value your feedback, please let us know what you think by commenting on this blog post or by clicking the ‘feedback’ button right in Log Analytics:

CloudEvents for Azure EventGrid via Azure Functions

by Contributed | Jan 18, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Azure Functions provides the built-in binding extensions feature for Azure EventGrid, which makes event data easier to publish and consume. But, the binding extension doesn’t support the CloudEvents format yet because it uses the current version of SDK that doesn’t support the CloudEvents schema yet. I suspect the binding extension will be available for CloudEvents when a new version of SDK becomes GA. Therefore, it requires a few extra coding efforts to send and receive CloudEvents data via Azure Functions app for now. Throughout this post, I will discuss how to make it.

I used .NET SDK in this post. But there are other SDKs in different languages of your choice:

JavaScript

Python

Java

Installing Azure EventGrid SDK Preview

At the time of this writing, the new SDK has the version of 4.0.0-beta.4–still in preview. With this SDK, you can send and receive event data in the format of CloudEvents. Install the preview version of the SDK by entering the following command:

    dotnet add package Azure.Messaging.EventGrid –version 4.0.0-beta.4

Let’s deal with the EventGrid data.

Sending Event Data in CloudEvents Format

To use EventGrid related commands in Azure CLI, you should install the relevant extension first:

    az extension add -n eventgrid

Then, get the endpoint of your EventGrid Custom Topic:

    endpoint=$(az eventgrid topic show

        -g [resource_group_name]

        -n [eventgrid_topic_name]

        –query “endpoint” -o tsv)

And, get the access key:

    id=$(az eventgrid topic show

        -g [resource_group_name]

        -n [eventgrid_topic_name]

        –query “id” -o tsv)
    key=$(az rest

        -m POST

        -u “https://management.azure.com$id/listKeys?api-version=2020-06-01”

        –query “key1” -o tsv)

With both endpoint and access key you got from the commands above, create the EventGrid publisher instance in your Azure Functions code:

    var topicEndpoint = new Uri(“[endpoint]”);

    var credential = new AzureKeyCredential(“[key]”);

    var publisher = new EventGridPublisherClient(topicEndpoint, credential);

You need more metadata details to send event data in the CloudEvents format.

source: Event Publisher–It’s a URL format in general.

type: Event Type–It distinguishes events from each other. It usually has a format like com.example.someevent.

datacontenttype: Always provide application/cloudevents+json.

The SDK takes care of the rest of the metadata that CloudEvents needs.

If you want to know more about the CloudEvents data spec, visit this page and have a read.

With those metadata details, build up the CloudEvents instances and send them to Azure EvengGrid.

    var source = “[source]”;

    var type = “[type]”;

    var dataContentType = “application/cloudevents+json”;
    var data = new MyData() { Hello = “World” };
    var @event = new CloudEvent(source, type, data, dataContentType);

    var events = new List<CloudEvent>() { @event };
    await publisher.SendEventsAsync(events).ConfigureAwait(false);

You can now send the event data in the CloudEvents format to EventGrid Custom Topic.

Receiving Event Data in CloudEvents Format

As mentioned above, Azure Functions has the EventGrid binding extension and it doesn’t support CloudEvents yet. Therefore, to process the CloudEvents data, you should use HTTP Trigger. And the trigger MUST handle two different types of requests at the same time.

Responding Event Handler Validation Requests

Handling Event Data

Responding Event Handler Validation Requests

According to the CloudEvents Webhook Spec, the validation requests uses the OPTIONS method/verb and include a request header of WebHook-Request-Origin (line #8). Therefore, to respond to the validation request, the header value MUST be sent back to the EventGrid Topic in the response header of WebHook-Allowed-Origin (line #9).

    [FunctionName(“HttpTrigger”)]

    public static async Task Run(

        [HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Anonymous, “POST”, “OPTIONS”, Route = “handler”)] HttpRequest req,

        ILogger log)

    {

        if (HttpMethods.IsOptions(req.Method))

        {

            string header = req.Headers[“WebHook-Request-Origin”];

            req.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add(“Webhook-Allowed-Origin”, header);
            return new OkResult();

        }
        …

    }

Handling Event Data

Once the validation request is successful, the Azure Functions endpoint will receive the event data with the POST method/verb from there. If you want to use the CloudEvents itself, use the @event instance in the following code snippet (line #18). If you only need the data part, deserialise it (line #19).

    [FunctionName(“HttpTrigger”)]

    public static async Task Run(

        [HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Anonymous, “POST”, “OPTIONS”, Route = “handler”)] HttpRequest req,

        ILogger log)

    {

        if (HttpMethods.IsOptions(req.Method))

        {

            …

        }
        using (var reader = new StreamReader(req.Body))

        {

            var payload = await reader.ReadToEndAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);

            var events = CloudEvent.Parse(payload);
            foreach (var @event in events)

            {

                var timestamp = @event.Time;

                var data = await @event.GetDataAsync<MyData>().ConfigureAwait(false);

                …

            }

        }
        return new OkResult();

    }

You can now receive and process the event data in the CloudEvents format within the Azure Functions code.

So far, we have walked through how Azure Functions app sends and receive event data formatted in CloudEvents for Azure EventGrid. Until the new version of the binding extension is released, we should stick on the approach like this. Hope the new one is released sooner rather than later.

This article was originally published on Dev Kimchi.

Vulnerability Summary for the Week of January 11, 2021

by Scott Muniz | Jan 18, 2021 | Security, Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

1c — 1c:enterprise The Web server in 1C:Enterprise 8 before 8.3.17.1851 sends base64 encoded credentials in the creds URL parameter. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3131
MISC 360f5 — 360f5 In the 3.1.3.64296 and lower version of 360F5, the third party can trigger the device to send a deauth frame by constructing and sending a specific illegal 802.11 Null Data Frame, which will cause other wireless terminals connected to disconnect from the wireless, so as to attack the router wireless by DoS. At present, the vulnerability has been effectively handled, and users can fix the vulnerability after updating the firmware version. 2021-01-11 not yet calculated CVE-2019-3405
MISC acmailer — acmailer Improper access control vulnerability in acmailer ver. 4.0.1 and earlier, and acmailer DB ver. 1.1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute an arbitrary OS command, or gain an administrative privilege which may result in obtaining the sensitive information on the server via unspecified vectors. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-20617
MISC
MISC acmailer — acmailer Privilege chaining vulnerability in acmailer ver. 4.0.2 and earlier, and acmailer DB ver. 1.1.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and to gain an administrative privilege which may result in obtaining the sensitive information on the server via unspecified vectors. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-20618
MISC
MISC adobe — animate Adobe Animate version 21.0 (and earlier) is affected by an uncontrolled search path element that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21008
CONFIRM adobe — bridge
Adobe Bridge version 11.0 (and earlier) is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability when parsing TTF files that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21013
MISC adobe — bridge
Adobe Bridge version 11.0 (and earlier) is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability when parsing TTF files that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21012
MISC adobe — campaign_classic_gold_standard Adobe Campaign Classic Gold Standard 10 (and earlier), 20.3.1 (and earlier), 20.2.3 (and earlier), 20.1.3 (and earlier), 19.2.3 (and earlier) and 19.1.7 (and earlier) are affected by a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to use the Campaign instance to issue unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21009
MISC adobe — captivate
Adobe Captivate 2019 version 11.5.1.499 (and earlier) is affected by an uncontrolled search path element vulnerability that could lead to privilege escalation. An attacker with permissions to write to the file system could leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21011
CONFIRM adobe — illustrator
Adobe Illustrator version 25.0 (and earlier) is affected by an uncontrolled search path element that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21007
CONFIRM adobe — incopy InCopy version 15.1.1 (and earlier) for Windows is affected by an uncontrolled search path vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21010
MISC adobe — photoshop Adobe Photoshop version 22.1 (and earlier) is affected by a heap buffer overflow vulnerability when handling a specially crafted font file. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21006
CONFIRM anydesk — anydesk
AnyDesk before 6.1.0 on Windows, when run in portable mode on a system where the attacker has write access to the application directory, allows this attacker to compromise a local user account via a read-only setting for a Trojan horse gcapi.dll file. 2021-01-11 not yet calculated CVE-2020-35483
CONFIRM apache — tomcat
When serving resources from a network location using the NTFS file system, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.39, 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.106 were susceptible to JSP source code disclosure in some configurations. The root cause was the unexpected behaviour of the JRE API File.getCanonicalPath() which in turn was caused by the inconsistent behaviour of the Windows API (FindFirstFileW) in some circumstances. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24122
MLIST
MISC
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST apache — xmlbeans
The XML parsers used by XMLBeans up to version 2.6.0 did not set the properties needed to protect the user from malicious XML input. Vulnerabilities include possibilities for XML Entity Expansion attacks. Affects XMLBeans up to and including v2.6.0. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23926
MISC
MISC aruba_networks — airwave_glass Multiple authenticated remote command executions are possible in Airwave Glass before 1.3.3 via the glassadmin cli. These allow for a user with glassadmin privileges to execute arbitrary code as root on the underlying host operating system. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-24638
MISC aruba_networks — airwave_glass There is a vulnerability caused by insufficient input validation that allows for arbitrary command execution in a containerized environment within Airwave Glass before 1.3.3. Successful exploitation can lead to complete compromise of the underlying host operating system. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-24640
MISC aruba_networks — airwave_glass In Aruba AirWave Glass before 1.3.3, there is a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability through an unauthenticated endpoint that if successfully exploited can result in disclosure of sensitive information. This can be used to perform an authentication bypass and ultimately gain administrative access on the web administrative interface. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-24641
MISC aruba_networks — airwave_glass
There is a vulnerability caused by unsafe Java deserialization that allows for arbitrary command execution in a containerized environment within Airwave Glass before 1.3.3. Successful exploitation can lead to complete compromise of the underlying host operating system. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-24639
MISC bosch — praesideo_and_praesensa
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Bosch PRAESIDEO until and including version 4.41 and Bosch PRAESENSA until and including version 1.10 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger actions on an affected system on behalf of another user (Cross-Site Request Forgery). This requires the victim to be tricked into clicking a malicious link or submitting a malicious form. A successful exploit allows the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privileges of the victim, e.g. creating and modifying user accounts, changing system configuration settings and cause DoS conditions. Note: For Bosch PRAESIDEO 4.31 and newer and Bosch PRAESENSA in all versions, the confidentiality impact is considered low because user credentials are not shown in the web interface. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-6776
CONFIRM bosch — praesideo_and_praesensa
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Bosch PRAESIDEO until and including version 4.41 and Bosch PRAESENSA until and including version 1.10 allows an authenticated remote attacker with admin privileges to mount a stored Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) attack against another user. When the victim logs into the management interface, the stored script code is executed in the context of his browser. A successful exploit would allow an attacker to interact with the management interface with the privileges of the victim. However, as the attacker already needs admin privileges, there is no additional impact on the management interface itself. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-6777
CONFIRM canonical — remote-login-service
In crypt.c of remote-login-service, the cryptographic algorithm used to cache usernames and passwords is insecure. An attacker could use this vulnerability to recover usernames and passwords from the file. This issue affects version 1.0.0-0ubuntu3 and prior versions. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2013-1053
UBUNTU canonical — ubuntu
Use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel exploitable by a local attacker due to reuse of a DCCP socket with an attached dccps_hc_tx_ccid object as a listener after being released. Fixed in Ubuntu Linux kernel 5.4.0-51.56, 5.3.0-68.63, 4.15.0-121.123, 4.4.0-193.224, 3.13.0.182.191 and 3.2.0-149.196. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-16119
UBUNTU
UBUNTU
CONFIRM
UBUNTU
UBUNTU
UBUNTU
UBUNTU
UBUNTU

cisco — anyconnect_secure_mobility_client

A vulnerability in the upgrade component of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client could allow an authenticated, local attacker with low privileges to read arbitrary files on the underlying operating system (OS) of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient file permission restrictions. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted command from the local CLI to the application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read arbitrary files on the underlying OS of the affected device. The attacker would need to have valid user credentials to exploit this vulnerability. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1258
CISCO cisco — anyconnect_secure_mobility_client
A vulnerability in the Network Access Manager and Web Security Agent components of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform a DLL injection attack. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to have valid credentials on the Windows system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of resources that are loaded by the application at run time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by inserting a configuration file in a specific path in the system which, in turn, causes a malicious DLL file to be loaded when the application starts. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected machine with SYSTEM privileges. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1237
CISCO cisco — asr_5000_series_routers
A vulnerability in the Secure FTP (SFTP) of Cisco StarOS for Cisco ASR 5000 Series Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files on an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to have valid credentials on the affected device. The vulnerability is due to insecure handling of symbolic links. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SFTP command to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read arbitrary files on the affected device. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1145
CISCO cisco — connected_mobile_experiences
A vulnerability in Cisco Connected Mobile Experiences (CMX) API authorizations could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to enumerate what users exist on the system. The vulnerability is due to a lack of authorization checks for certain API GET requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending specific API GET requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to enumerate users of the CMX system. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1143
CISCO cisco — connected_mobile_experiences
A vulnerability in Cisco Connected Mobile Experiences (CMX) could allow a remote, authenticated attacker without administrative privileges to alter the password of any user on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of authorization checks for changing a password. An authenticated attacker without administrative privileges could exploit this vulnerability by sending a modified HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to alter the passwords of any user on the system, including an administrative user, and then impersonate that user. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1144
CISCO cisco — dna_center
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco DNA Center software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface of an affected device. The vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to have administrative credentials on the affected device. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1130
CISCO cisco — enterprise_nfv_infrastructure_software
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface. The vulnerability is due to improper input validation of log file content stored on the affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by modifying a log file with malicious code and getting a user to view the modified log file. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or to access sensitive, browser-based information. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1127
CISCO

cisco — finesse

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack and obtain potentially confidential information by leveraging a flaw in the authentication mechanism. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1246
CISCO cisco — finesse Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack and obtain potentially confidential information by leveraging a flaw in the authentication mechanism. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1245
CISCO cisco — firepower_management_center Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface of an affected system. The vulnerabilities exist because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1239
CISCO cisco — firepower_management_center A vulnerability in the storage of proxy server credentials of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to view credentials for a configured proxy server. The vulnerability is due to clear-text storage and weak permissions of related configuration files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the CLI of the affected software and viewing the contents of the affected files. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view the credentials that are used to access the proxy server. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1126
CISCO cisco — firepower_management_center Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface of an affected system. The vulnerabilities exist because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1238
CISCO cisco — firepower_management_center A vulnerability in the dashboard widget of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper restrictions on XML entities. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting an XML-based widget on an affected server. A successful exploit could cause increased memory and CPU utilization, which could result in a DoS condition. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1267
CISCO cisco — multiple_products Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of an HTTP range header. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured file policy for HTTP packets and deliver a malicious payload. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1223
CISCO cisco — multiple_products Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort application detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured policies on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the detection algorithm. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets that would flow through an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the configured policies and deliver a malicious payload to the protected network. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1236
CISCO cisco — multiple_products Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability with TCP Fast Open (TFO) when used in conjunction with the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect detection of the HTTP payload if it is contained at least partially within the TFO connection handshake. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted TFO packets with an HTTP payload through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured file policy for HTTP packets and deliver a malicious payload. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1224
CISCO cisco — multiple_products
A vulnerability in the audit logging component of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, Cisco Unity Connection, Cisco Emergency Responder, and Cisco Prime License Manager could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive information in clear text on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to the storage of certain unencrypted credentials. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the audit logs on an affected system and obtaining credentials that they may not normally have access to. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to use those credentials to discover and manage network devices. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1226
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1201
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1205
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1181
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1173
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1175
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1161
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1183
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1168
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1169
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1170
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1179
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1171
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1174
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1182
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1176
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1177
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1178
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1172
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1202
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1167
MISC
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1190
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1165
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary commands that are executed with root privileges. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to a targeted device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on an affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1146
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1180
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1164
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1307
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1217
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1204
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1159
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1166
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1160
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1203
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1200
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1191
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1162
CISCO cisco — multiple_small_business_routers
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1163
CISCO

cisco — multiple_small_business_routers

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1360
CISCO cisco — proximity_desktop_for_windows
A vulnerability in the loading process of specific DLLs in Cisco Proximity Desktop for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to load a malicious library. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid credentials on the Windows system. This vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of directory paths at run time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by placing a malicious DLL file in a specific location on the targeted system. This file will execute when the vulnerable application launches. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the targeted system with the privileges of another user’s account. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1240
CISCO cisco — video_surveillance_8000_series_ip_cameras
A vulnerability in the Cisco Discovery Protocol implementation for Cisco Video Surveillance 8000 Series IP Cameras could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected IP camera to reload. The vulnerability is due to missing checks when Cisco Discovery Protocol messages are processed. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious Cisco Discovery Protocol packet to an affected IP camera. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected IP camera to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. Note: Cisco Discovery Protocol is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1131
CISCO

cisco — webex_meetings

A vulnerability in the reclaim host role feature of Cisco Webex Meetings and Cisco Webex Meetings Server could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to take over the host role during a meeting. This vulnerability is due to a lack of protection against brute forcing of the host key. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted requests to a vulnerable Cisco Webex Meetings or Webex Meetings Server site. A successful exploit would require the attacker to have access to join a Webex meeting, including applicable meeting join links and passwords. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to acquire or take over the host role for a meeting. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1311
CISCO cisco — webex_meetings
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Webex Meetings could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to redirect a user to an untrusted web page, bypassing the warning mechanism that should prompt the user before the redirection. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation of the URL parameters in an HTTP request. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to redirect a user to a malicious website, bypassing the Webex URL check that should result in a warning before the redirection to the web page. Attackers may use this type of vulnerability, known as an open redirect attack, as part of a phishing attack to convince users to unknowingly visit malicious sites. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1310
CISCO cisco — webex_teams
A vulnerability in Cisco Webex Teams could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to manipulate file names within the messaging interface. The vulnerability exists because the affected software mishandles character rendering. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sharing a file within the application interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to modify how the shared file name displays within the interface, which could allow the attacker to conduct phishing or spoofing attacks. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1242
CISCO clusterlabs — hawk
An issue was discovered in ClusterLabs Hawk 2.x through 2.3.0-x. There is a Ruby shell code injection issue via the hawk_remember_me_id parameter in the login_from_cookie cookie. The user logout routine could be used by unauthenticated remote attackers to execute code as hauser. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-35458
MLIST
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM coturn — coturn
Coturn is free open source implementation of TURN and STUN Server. Coturn before version 4.5.2 by default does not allow peers to connect and relay packets to loopback addresses in the range of `127.x.x.x`. However, it was observed that when sending a `CONNECT` request with the `XOR-PEER-ADDRESS` value of `0.0.0.0`, a successful response was received and subsequently, `CONNECTIONBIND` also received a successful response. Coturn then is able to relay packets to the loopback interface. Additionally, when coturn is listening on IPv6, which is default, the loopback interface can also be reached by making use of either `[::1]` or `[::]` as the peer address. By using the address `0.0.0.0` as the peer address, a malicious user will be able to relay packets to the loopback interface, unless `–denied-peer-ip=0.0.0.0` (or similar) has been specified. Since the default configuration implies that loopback peers are not allowed, coturn administrators may choose to not set the `denied-peer-ip` setting. The issue patched in version 4.5.2. As a workaround the addresses in the address block `0.0.0.0/8`, `[::1]` and `[::]` should be denied by default unless `–allow-loopback-peers` has been specified. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-26262
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM dell — emc_avamar_server
DELL EMC Avamar Server, versions 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, contain a SQL Injection Vulnerability in Fitness Analyzer. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the execution of certain SQL commands on the application’s backend database, causing unauthorized read and write access to application data. Exploitation may lead to leakage or deletion of sensitive backup data; hence the severity is Critical. Dell EMC recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29493
CONFIRM dell — emc_avamar_server
Dell EMC Avamar Server, versions 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, contain a Path Traversal Vulnerability in PDM. A remote user could potentially exploit this vulnerability, to gain unauthorized write access to the arbitrary files stored on the server filesystem, causing deletion of arbitrary files. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29494
CONFIRM dell — emc_avamar_server
DELL EMC Avamar Server, versions 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, contain an OS Command Injection Vulnerability in Fitness Analyzer. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the execution of arbitrary OS commands on the application’s underlying OS with high privileges. This vulnerability is considered critical as it can be leveraged to completely compromise the vulnerable application as well as the underlying operating system. Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29495
CONFIRM discourse — discourse In Discourse 2.7.0 through beta1, a rate-limit bypass leads to a bypass of the 2FA requirement for certain forms. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3138
MISC
MISC
MISC docker — desktop_community Docker Desktop Community before 2.5.0.0 on macOS mishandles certificate checking, leading to local privilege escalation. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3162
MISC
MISC eclipse — hawkbit In all version of Eclipse Hawkbit prior to 0.3.0M7, the HTTP 404 (Not Found) JSON response body returned by the REST API may contain unsafe characters within the path attribute. Sending a POST request to a non existing resource will return the full path from the given URL unescaped to the client. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-27219
CONFIRM
CONFIRM eclipse — hono_amqp_and_mqtt
The Eclipse Hono AMQP and MQTT protocol adapters do not check whether an authenticated gateway device is authorized to receive command & control messages when it has subscribed only to commands for a specific device. The missing check involves verifying that the command target device is configured giving permission for the gateway device to act on its behalf. This means an authenticated device of a certain tenant, notably also a non-gateway device acting like a gateway, may receive command & control messages targeted at a different device of the same tenant without corresponding permissions getting checked. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-27220
CONFIRM elasticsearch — elasticsearch
Elasticsearch versions 7.7.0 to 7.10.1 contain an information disclosure flaw in the async search API. Users who execute an async search will improperly store the HTTP headers. An Elasticsearch user with the ability to read the .tasks index could obtain sensitive request headers of other users in the cluster. This issue is fixed in Elasticsearch 7.10.2 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-22132
MISC erlang — otp
An issue was discovered in Erlang/OTP before 23.2.2. The ssl application 10.2 accepts and trusts an invalid X.509 certificate chain to a trusted root Certification Authority. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-35733
CONFIRM
MISC
MISC
MISC espressif — esp-idf
Espressif ESP-IDF 2.x, 3.0.x through 3.0.9, 3.1.x through 3.1.7, 3.2.x through 3.2.3, 3.3.x through 3.3.2, and 4.0.x through 4.0.1 has a Buffer Overflow in BluFi provisioning in btc_blufi_recv_handler function in blufi_prf.c. An attacker can send a crafted BluFi protocol Write Attribute command to characteristic 0xFF01. With manipulated packet fields, there is a buffer overflow. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-16146
MISC
MISC facade — ignition Ignition before 2.5.2, as used in Laravel and other products, allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code because of insecure usage of file_get_contents() and file_put_contents(). This is exploitable on sites using debug mode with Laravel before 8.4.2. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3129
MISC
MISC flatcore — flatcore
An issue was discovered in flatCore before 2.0.0 build 139. A reflected XSS vulnerability was identified in the media_filter HTTP request body parameter for the acp interface. The affected parameter accepts malicious client-side script without proper input sanitization. For example, a malicious user can leverage this vulnerability to steal cookies from a victim user and perform a session-hijacking attack, which may then lead to unauthorized access to the site. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23838
MISC
MISC
MISC flatcore — flatcore
An issue was discovered in flatCore before 2.0.0 build 139. A time-based blind SQL injection was identified in the selected_folder HTTP request body parameter for the acp interface. The affected parameter (which retrieves the file contents of the specified folder) was found to be accepting malicious user input without proper sanitization, thus leading to SQL injection. Database related information can be successfully retrieved. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23837
MISC
MISC
MISC flatcore — flatcore
An issue was discovered in flatCore before 2.0.0 build 139. A stored XSS vulnerability was identified in the prefs_smtp_psw HTTP request body parameter for the acp interface. An admin user can inject malicious client-side script into the affected parameter without any form of input sanitization. The injected payload will be executed in the browser of a user whenever one visits the affected module page. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23836
MISC
MISC
MISC flatcore — flatcore
An issue was discovered in flatCore before 2.0.0 build 139. A local file disclosure vulnerability was identified in the docs_file HTTP request body parameter for the acp interface. This can be exploited with admin access rights. The affected parameter (which retrieves the contents of the specified file) was found to be accepting malicious user input without proper sanitization, thus leading to retrieval of backend server sensitive files, e.g., /etc/passwd, SQLite database files, PHP source code, etc. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23835
MISC
MISC
MISC flatpak — flatpak
Flatpak is a system for building, distributing, and running sandboxed desktop applications on Linux. A bug was discovered in the `flatpak-portal` service that can allow sandboxed applications to execute arbitrary code on the host system (a sandbox escape). This sandbox-escape bug is present in versions from 0.11.4 and before fixed versions 1.8.5 and 1.9.4. The Flatpak portal D-Bus service (`flatpak-portal`, also known by its D-Bus service name `org.freedesktop.portal.Flatpak`) allows apps in a Flatpak sandbox to launch their own subprocesses in a new sandbox instance, either with the same security settings as the caller or with more restrictive security settings. For example, this is used in Flatpak-packaged web browsers such as Chromium to launch subprocesses that will process untrusted web content, and give those subprocesses a more restrictive sandbox than the browser itself. In vulnerable versions, the Flatpak portal service passes caller-specified environment variables to non-sandboxed processes on the host system, and in particular to the `flatpak run` command that is used to launch the new sandbox instance. A malicious or compromised Flatpak app could set environment variables that are trusted by the `flatpak run` command, and use them to execute arbitrary code that is not in a sandbox. As a workaround, this vulnerability can be mitigated by preventing the `flatpak-portal` service from starting, but that mitigation will prevent many Flatpak apps from working correctly. This is fixed in versions 1.8.5 and 1.9.4. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21261
MISC
MISC
MISC
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM
DEBIAN fortinet — fortideceptor An OS command injection vulnerability in FortiDeceptor 3.1.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.0 may allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by exploiting a command injection vulnerability on the Customization page. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29017
MISC fortinet — fortiweb A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in FortiWeb 6.3.0 through 6.3.5 and version before 6.2.4 may allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to overwrite the content of the stack and potentially execute arbitrary code by sending a crafted request with a large certname. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29016
MISC fortinet — fortiweb
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in FortiWeb 6.3.0 through 6.3.7 and version before 6.2.4 may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to crash the httpd daemon thread by sending a request with a crafted cookie header. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29019
MISC fortinet — fortiweb
A format string vulnerability in FortiWeb 6.3.0 through 6.3.5 may allow an authenticated, remote attacker to read the content of memory and retrieve sensitive data via the redir parameter. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29018
MISC fortinet — fortiweb
A blind SQL injection in the user interface of FortiWeb 6.3.0 through 6.3.7 and version before 6.2.4 may allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL queries or commands by sending a request with a crafted Authorization header containing a malicious SQL statement. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29015
MISC git-big-picture — git-big-picture git-big-picture before 1.0.0 mishandles ‘ characters in a branch name, leading to code execution. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3028
MISC
MISC
MISC git-lfs — git-lfs Git LFS is a command line extension for managing large files with Git. On Windows, if Git LFS operates on a malicious repository with a git.bat or git.exe file in the current directory, that program would be executed, permitting the attacker to execute arbitrary code. This does not affect Unix systems. This is the result of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-27955. This issue occurs because on Windows, Go includes (and prefers) the current directory when the name of a command run does not contain a directory separator. Other than avoiding untrusted repositories or using a different operating system, there is no workaround. This is fixed in v2.13.2. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21237
MISC
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM gitlab — gitlab A regular expression denial of service issue has been discovered in NuGet API affecting all versions of GitLab starting from version 12.8. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-22168
CONFIRM
MISC gitlab — gitlab An attacker could cause a Prometheus denial of service in GitLab 13.7+ by sending an HTTP request with a malformed method 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-22166
CONFIRM
MISC gitlab — gitlab
An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 12.4. The regex used for package names is written in a way that makes execution time have quadratic growth based on the length of the malicious input string. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-26414
CONFIRM
MISC gitlab — gitlab
An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 12.1. Incorrect headers in specific project page allows attacker to have a temporary read access to the private repository 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-22167
CONFIRM
MISC
MISC gitlab — gitlab_pages
Insufficient validation of authentication parameters in GitLab Pages for GitLab 11.5+ allows an attacker to steal a victim’s API token if they click on a maliciously crafted link 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-22171
CONFIRM
MISC
MISC google — chrome
Use after free in Media in Google Chrome prior to 81.0.4044.92 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-6572
MISC
MISC google — chrome_for_android
Use after Free in Payments in Google Chrome on Android prior to 87.0.4280.66 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-16045
MISC
MISC google — chrome_for_ios
Script injection in iOSWeb in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 84.0.4147.105 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-16046
MISC
MISC html/java_api — html/java_api There exists a race condition between the deletion of the temporary file and the creation of the temporary directory in `webkit` subproject of HTML/Java API version 1.7. A similar vulnerability has recently been disclosed in other Java projects and the fix in HTML/Java API version 1.7.1 follows theirs: To avoid local privilege escalation version 1.7.1 creates the temporary directory atomically without dealing with the temporary file: https://github.com/apache/netbeans-html4j/commit/fa70e507e5555e1adb4f6518479fc408a7abd0e6 2021-01-11 not yet calculated CVE-2020-17534
MISC huawei — cloudengine
There is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Huawei CloudEngine products. The software reads data past the end of the intended buffer when parsing certain PIM message, an adjacent attacker could send crafted PIM messages to the device, successful exploit could cause out of bounds read when the system does the certain operation. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-1865
MISC huawei — multiple_products
There is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in several products. The software reads data past the end of the intended buffer when parsing certain crafted DHCP messages. Successful exploit could cause certain service abnormal. Affected product versions include:NIP6800 versions V500R001C30,V500R001C60SPC500,V500R005C00;S12700 versions V200R008C00;S2700 versions V200R008C00;S5700 versions V200R008C00;S6700 versions V200R008C00;S7700 versions V200R008C00;S9700 versions V200R008C00;Secospace USG6600 versions V500R001C30SPC200,V500R001C30SPC600,V500R001C60SPC500,V500R005C00;USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC300,V500R001C30SPC600,V500R001C60SPC500,V500R005C00. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-1866
MISC huawei — multiple_smartphones There is an Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in some Huawei smartphone. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause out-of-bounds access to the physical memory. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9145
MISC huawei — multiple_smartphones There is a vulnerability with buffer access with incorrect length value in some Huawei Smartphone.Unauthorized users may trigger code execution when a buffer overflow occurs. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9140
MISC huawei — multiple_smartphones
There is a improper input validation vulnerability in some Huawei Smartphone.Successful exploit of this vulnerability can cause memory access errors and denial of service. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9139
MISC huawei — multiple_smartphones
There is a heap base buffer overflow vulnerability in some Huawei smartphone.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can cause heap overflow and memory overwriting when the system incorrectly processes the update file. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9142
MISC huawei — multiple_smartphones
There is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in some Huawei Smartphone, Successful exploit of this vulnerability can cause process exceptions during updating. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9138
MISC huawei — multiple_smartphones
There is a missing authentication vulnerability in some Huawei smartphone.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may lead to low-sensitive information exposure. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9143
MISC huawei — multiple_smartphones
There is a heap overflow vulnerability in some Huawei smartphone, attackers can exploit this vulnerability to cause heap overflows due to improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9144
CONFIRM huawei — multiple_smartphones
There is a improper privilege management vulnerability in some Huawei smartphone. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can cause information disclosure and malfunctions due to insufficient verification of data authenticity. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9141
MISC huawei — p30
There is a resource management errors vulnerability in Huawei P30. Local attackers construct broadcast message for some application, causing this application to send this broadcast message and impact the customer’s use experience. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9203
MISC huawei — smc
There is a privilege escalation vulnerability in SMC2.0 product. Some files in a directory of a module are located improperly. It does not apply the directory limitation. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting malicious file to launch privilege escalation. This can compromise normal service of affected products. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9209
MISC jenkins — jenkins Jenkins 2.274 and earlier, LTS 2.263.1 and earlier allows users with Agent/Configure permission to choose agent names that cause Jenkins to override the global `config.xml` file. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21605
CONFIRM jenkins — jenkins Jenkins Bumblebee HP ALM Plugin 4.1.5 and earlier stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins controller file system. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21614
CONFIRM jenkins — jenkins
Jenkins TICS Plugin 2020.3.0.6 and earlier does not escape TICS service responses, resulting in a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers able to control TICS service response content. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21613
CONFIRM jenkins — jenkins
Jenkins TraceTronic ECU-TEST Plugin 2.23.1 and earlier stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins controller file system. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21612
CONFIRM joomla! — joomla! An issue was discovered in Joomla! 3.9.0 through 3.9.23. The lack of escaping in mod_breadcrumbs aria-label attribute allows XSS attacks. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23124
MISC joomla! — joomla!
An issue was discovered in Joomla! 3.0.0 through 3.9.23. The lack of ACL checks in the orderPosition endpoint of com_modules leak names of unpublished and/or inaccessible modules. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23123
MISC jquery-validation — jquery-validation The jQuery Validation Plugin provides drop-in validation for your existing forms. It is published as an npm package “jquery-validation”. jquery-validation before version 1.19.3 contains one or more regular expressions that are vulnerable to ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service). This is fixed in 1.19.3. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21252
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM
MISC juniper_networks — contrail_networking
An Information Exposure vulnerability in Juniper Networks Contrail Networking allows a locally authenticated attacker able to read files to retrieve administrator credentials stored in plaintext thereby elevating their privileges over the system. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Contrail Networking versions prior to 1911.31. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0212
CONFIRM juniper_networks — ex_and_qfx5k_series_platforms
On Juniper Networks EX and QFX5K Series platforms configured with Redundant Trunk Group (RTG), Storm Control profile applied on the RTG interface might not take affect when it reaches the threshold condition. Storm Control enables the device to monitor traffic levels and to drop broadcast, multicast, and unknown unicast packets when a specified traffic level is exceeded, thus preventing packets from proliferating and degrading the LAN. Note: this issue does not affect EX2200, EX3300, EX4200, and EX9200 Series. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on EX Series and QFX5K Series: 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R7-S7; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R7-S8; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R3-S4; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S8; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S11, 17.4R3-S2; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S10; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S5; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2-S4, 18.3R3-S2; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S5, 18.4R3-S3; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S2; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R2-S1, 19.2R3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S4, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S3, 19.4R2-S1, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S2, 20.1R2. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0203
CONFIRM juniper_networks — ex_and_qfx_series_switches
A vulnerability in processing of certain DHCP packets from adjacent clients on EX Series and QFX Series switches running Juniper Networks Junos OS with DHCP local/relay server configured may lead to exhaustion of DMA memory causing a Denial of Service (DoS). Over time, exploitation of this vulnerability may cause traffic to stop being forwarded, or to crashing of the fxpc process. When Packet DMA heap utilization reaches 99%, the system will become unstable. Packet DMA heap utilization can be monitored through the following command: user@junos# request pfe execute target fpc0 timeout 30 command “show heap” ID Base Total(b) Free(b) Used(b) % Name — ———- ———– ———– ———– — ———– 0 213301a8 536870488 387228840 149641648 27 Kernel 1 91800000 8388608 3735120 4653488 55 DMA 2 92000000 75497472 74452192 1045280 1 PKT DMA DESC 3 d330000 335544320 257091400 78452920 23 Bcm_sdk 4 96800000 184549376 2408 184546968 99 Packet DMA <— 5 903fffe0 20971504 20971504 0 0 Blob An indication of the issue occurring may be observed through the following log messages: Dec 10 08:07:00.124 2020 hostname fpc0 brcm_pkt_buf_alloc:523 (buf alloc) failed allocating packet buffer Dec 10 08:07:00.126 2020 hostname fpc0 (buf alloc) failed allocating packet buffer Dec 10 08:07:00.128 2020 hostname fpc0 brcm_pkt_buf_alloc:523 (buf alloc) failed allocating packet buffer Dec 10 08:07:00.130 2020 hostnameC fpc0 (buf alloc) failed allocating packet buffer This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on EX Series and QFX Series: 17.4R3 versions prior to 17.4R3-S3; 18.1R3 versions between 18.1R3-S6 and 18.1R3-S11; 18.2R3 versions prior to 18.2R3-S6; 18.3R3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S4; 18.4R2 versions prior to 18.4R2-S5; 18.4R3 versions prior to 18.4R3-S6; 19.1 versions between 19.1R2 and 19.1R3-S3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R1-S2, 20.2R2. Junos OS versions prior to 17.4R3 are unaffected by this vulnerability. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0217
CONFIRM

juniper_networks — junos_os

In an EVPN/VXLAN scenario, if an IRB interface with a virtual gateway address (VGA) is configured on a PE, a traffic loop may occur upon receipt of specific IP multicast traffic. The traffic loop will cause interface traffic to increase abnormally, ultimately leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) in packet processing. The following command could be used to monitor the interface traffic: user@junos> monitor interface traffic Interface Link Input packets (pps) Output packets (pps) et-0/0/1 Up 6492089274364 (70994959) 6492089235319 (70994956) et-0/0/25 Up 343458103 (1) 156844 (0) ae0 Up 9132519197257 (70994959) 9132519139454 (70994956) This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX Series: all versions prior to 17.3R3-S10; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S11; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S6; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S5, 18.4R3-S5; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R1-S2, 20.2R2. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0221
CONFIRM

juniper_networks — junos_os

A command injection vulnerability in install package validation subsystem of Juniper Networks Junos OS that may allow a locally authenticated attacker with privileges to execute commands with root privilege. To validate a package in Junos before installation, an administrator executes the command ‘request system software add validate-on-host’ via the CLI. An attacker with access to this CLI command may be able to exploit this vulnerability. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: all versions prior to 17.3R3-S10; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S11; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2-S8, 18.2R3-S6; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S8, 18.4R2-S7, 18.4R3-S6; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3-S1; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3-S1; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R1-S2, 20.2R2; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R1-S1, 20.3R2. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0219
CONFIRM juniper_networks — junos_os
When the “Intrusion Detection Service” (IDS) feature is configured on Juniper Networks MX series with a dynamic firewall filter using IPv6 source or destination prefix, it may incorrectly match the prefix as /32, causing the filter to block unexpected traffic. This issue affects only IPv6 prefixes when used as source and destination. This issue affects MX Series devices using MS-MPC, MS-MIC or MS-SPC3 service cards with IDS service configured. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S10 on MX Series; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R3-S3 on MX Series; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S11 on MX Series; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S6 on MX Series; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S4 on MX Series; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R3-S6 on MX Series; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S3 on MX Series; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S1 on MX Series; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3-S1 on MX Series; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3 on MX Series; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2 on MX Series; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R2 on MX Series; 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0205
CONFIRM juniper_networks — junos_os
A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to send a specific packet causing the packet forwarding engine (PFE) to crash and restart, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). By continuously sending these specific packets, an attacker can repeatedly disable the PFE causing a sustained Denial of Service (DoS). This issue only affects Juniper Networks NFX Series, SRX Series platforms when SSL Proxy is configured. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on NFX Series and SRX Series: 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R3-S1; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S2, 19.2R2; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS versions on NFX Series and SRX Series prior to 18.3R1. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0206
CONFIRM juniper_networks — junos_os
An improper interpretation conflict of certain data between certain software components within the Juniper Networks Junos OS devices does not allow certain traffic to pass through the device upon receipt from an ingress interface filtering certain specific types of traffic which is then being redirected to an egress interface on a different VLAN. This causes a Denial of Service (DoS) to those clients sending these particular types of traffic. Such traffic being sent by a client may appear genuine, but is non-standard in nature and should be considered as potentially malicious, and can be targeted to the device, or destined through it for the issue to occur. This issues affects IPv4 and IPv6 traffic. An indicator of compromise may be found by checking log files. You may find that traffic on the input interface has 100% of traffic flowing into the device, yet the egress interface shows 0 pps leaving the device. For example: [show interfaces “interface” statistics detail] Output between two interfaces would reveal something similar to: Ingress, first interface: ——————– Interface Link Input packets (pps) Output packets (pps) et-0/0/0 Up 9999999999 (9999) 1 (0) ——————– Egress, second interface: ——————– Interface Link Input packets (pps) Output packets (pps) et-0/0/1 Up 0 (0) 9999999999 (0) ——————– Dropped packets will not show up in DDoS monitoring/protection counters as issue is not caused by anti-DDoS protection mechanisms. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS: 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S7 on NFX250, QFX5K Series, EX4600; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S11, 17.4R3-S3 on NFX250, QFX5K Series, EX4600; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S9 on NFX250, QFX5K Series, EX2300 Series, EX3400 Series, EX4600; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S3 on NFX250, QFX5K Series, EX2300 Series, EX3400 Series, EX4300 Multigigabit, EX4600; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S1 on NFX250, QFX5K Series, EX2300 Series, EX3400 Series, EX4300 Multigigabit, EX4600 Series; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S5, 18.4R2-S3, 18.4R3 on NFX250, QFX5K Series, EX2300 Series, EX3400 Series, EX4300 Multigigabit, EX4600 Series; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S5, 19.1R2-S1, 19.1R3 on NFX250, QFX5K Series, EX2300 Series, EX3400 Series, EX4300 Multigigabit, EX4600 Series; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R2 on NFX250, QFX5K Series, EX2300 Series, EX3400 Series, EX4300 Multigigabit, EX4600 Series; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S3, 19.3R3 on NFX250, QFX5K Series, EX2300 Series, EX3400 Series, EX4300 Multigigabit, EX4600 Series; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S2, 19.4R2 on NFX250, NFX350, QFX5K Series, EX2300 Series, EX3400 Series, EX4300 Multigigabit, EX4600 Series. This issue does not affect Junos OS releases prior to 17.2R2. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0207
CONFIRM juniper_networks — junos_os
An improper input validation vulnerability in the Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) service of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to send a malformed RSVP packet when bidirectional LSPs are in use, which when received by an egress router crashes the RPD causing a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Continued receipt of the packet will sustain the Denial of Service. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS: All versions prior to 17.3R3-S10 except 15.1X49-D240 for SRX series; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R3-S2; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S10; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2-S7, 18.2R3-S4; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S2; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S8, 18.4R2-S6, 18.4R3-S2; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S5, 19.1R3-S3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3-S1; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S4, 20.1R2; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D240 on SRX Series. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved: 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S5-EVO; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S2-EVO; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S4-EVO. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0208
CONFIRM
MISC
MISC juniper_networks — junos_os
A command injection vulnerability in the license-check daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS that may allow a locally authenticated attacker with low privileges to execute commands with root privilege. license-check is a daemon used to manage licenses in Junos OS. To update licenses, a user executes the command ‘request system license update’ via the CLI. An attacker with access to this CLI command may be able to exploit the vulnerability. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S9; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S11; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S6; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R3-S6; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S4, 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R1-S2, 20.2R2. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0218
CONFIRM juniper_networks — junos_os
An Information Exposure vulnerability in J-Web of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated attacker to elevate their privileges over the target system through opportunistic use of an authenticated users session. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 12.3 versions prior to 12.3R12-S17; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S10; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S11; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S6; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2-S4, 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S5, 18.4R3-S5; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R3, 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S4, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S3, 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S4, 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R1-S1, 20.2R2. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0210
CONFIRM juniper_networks — junos_os
A sensitive information disclosure vulnerability in delta-export configuration utility (dexp) of Juniper Networks Junos OS may allow a locally authenticated shell user the ability to create and read database files generated by the dexp utility, including password hashes of local users. Since dexp is shipped with setuid permissions enabled and is owned by the root user, this vulnerability may allow a local privileged user the ability to run dexp with root privileges and access sensitive information in the dexp database. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R7-S8; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D230; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S9; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S11; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S6; 18.2X75 versions prior to 18.2X75-D34; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S7, 18.4R3-S6; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3-S1; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S3, 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3-S1; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S4, 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R1-S2, 20.2R2. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0204
CONFIRM

juniper_networks — junos_os_and_junos_os_evolved_routing_protocol_daemon

An improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) service allows an attacker to send a valid BGP FlowSpec message thereby causing an unexpected change in the route advertisements within the BGP FlowSpec domain leading to disruptions in network traffic causing a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Continued receipt of these update messages will cause a sustained Denial of Service condition. This issue affects Juniper Networks: Junos OS: All versions prior to 17.3R3-S10 with the exceptions of 15.1X49-D240 on SRX Series and 15.1R7-S8 on EX Series; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S10; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S4; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S12; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2-S8, 18.2R3-S6; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S8, 18.4R2-S6, 18.4R3-S6; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3-S1; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S3, 19.4R2-S3, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R1-S3 20.2R2; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R1-S1, 20.3R2. Junos OS Evolved: All versions prior to 20.3R1-S1-EVO, 20.3R2-EVO. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0211
CONFIRM juniper_networks — junos_os_evolved
In Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved an attacker sending certain valid BGP update packets may cause Junos OS Evolved to access an uninitialized pointer causing RPD to core leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt of these types of valid BGP update packets will cause an extended Denial of Service condition. RPD will require a restart to recover. An indicator of compromise is to see if the file rpd.re exists by issuing the command: show system core-dumps This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S2-EVO; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S2-EVO, 20.1R2-S1-EVO. This issue does not affect Junos OS. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0209
CONFIRM

juniper_networks — junos_os

A local privilege escalation vulnerability in telnetd.real of Juniper Networks Junos OS may allow a locally authenticated shell user to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary commands as root. telnetd.real is shipped with setuid permissions enabled and is owned by the root user, allowing local users to run telnetd.real with root privileges. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: all versions prior to 15.1R7-S9; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S11; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S11; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S6; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2-S4, 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S7, 18.4R3-S6; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S4; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S6, 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S1; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S4, 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R2. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0223
CONFIRM

juniper_networks — junos_os

A vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) to the device by sending certain crafted protocol packets from an adjacent device with invalid payloads to the device. These crafted packets, which should be discarded, are instead replicated and sent to the RE. Over time, a Denial of Service (DoS) occurs. Continued receipt of these crafted protocol packets will cause an extended Denial of Service (DoS) condition, which may cause wider traffic impact due to protocol flapping. An indication of compromise is to check “monitor interface traffic” on the ingress and egress port packet counts. For each ingress packet, two duplicate packets are seen on egress. This issue can be triggered by IPv4 and IPv6 packets. This issue affects all traffic through the device. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS: 14.1X53 versions prior to 14.1X53-D53 on EX4300, QFX3500, QFX5100, EX4600; 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R7-S6 on EX4300, QFX3500, QFX5100, EX4600; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R7-S7 on EX4300, QFX5100, EX4600; 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R2-S11 on EX4300, QFX5100, EX4600; 17.1 versions prior to 117.1R3-S2 on EX4300; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R1-S9 on EX4300; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R3-S3 on EX4300, QFX5100, EX4600, QFX5110, QFX5200; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R2-S5, 17.3R3-S7 on EX4300, QFX5100, EX4600, QFX5110, QFX5200; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S9, 17.4R3 on EX4300, QFX5100, EX4600, QFX5110, QFX5200; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S9 on EX4300, QFX5100, EX4600, QFX5110, QFX5200, QFX5210, EX2300, EX3400; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2-S7 on EX4300; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S3 on EX4300, QFX5100, EX4600, QFX5110, QFX5200, QFX5210, EX2300, EX3400; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2-S3, on EX4300; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R1-S7, 18.3R3-S1 on EX4300, QFX5100, EX4600, QFX5110, QFX5200, QFX5210, QFX5120, EX4650, EX2300, EX3400; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S5, 18.4R2-S3, 18.4R3 on EX4300, QFX5100, EX4600, QFX5110, QFX5200, QFX5210, QFX5120, EX4650, EX2300, EX3400; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S4, 19.1R2-S1, 19.1R3 on EX4300, QFX5100, EX4600, QFX5110, QFX5200, QFX5210, QFX5120, EX4650, EX2300, EX3400; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S4, 19.2R2 on EX4300; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S3, 19.2R2 on QFX5100, EX4600, QFX5110, QFX5200, QFX5210, QFX5120, EX4650, EX2300, EX3400; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S1, 19.3R3 on EX4300; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R1-S1, 19.3R2, 19.3R3 on QFX5100, EX4600, QFX5110, QFX5200, QFX5210, QFX5120, EX4650, EX2300, EX3400; 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0222
CONFIRM juniper_networks — multiple_products
On Juniper Networks Junos EX series, QFX Series and SRX branch series devices, a memory leak occurs every time the 802.1X authenticator port interface flaps which can lead to other processes, such as the pfex process, responsible for packet forwarding, to crash and restart. An administrator can use the following CLI command to monitor the status of memory consumption: user@device> show task memory detail Please refer to https://kb.juniper.net/KB31522 for details. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: 14.1X53 versions prior to 14.1X53-D54; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D240 ; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D593; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R7-S8; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R3-S4; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S8; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S11, 17.4R3-S2; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S10 ; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2-S7, 18.2R3-S3; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2-S4, 18.3R3-S2; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S7, 18.4R2-S4, 18.4R3-S2; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S5, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R2; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S3, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S2, 19.4R2. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS 12.3, 15.1. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0215
CONFIRM juniper_networks — mx_and_ex9200_series_platforms
On Juniper Networks MX Series and EX9200 Series platforms with Trio-based MPC (Modular Port Concentrator) where Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB) interface is configured and it is mapped to a VPLS instance or a Bridge-Domain, certain network events at Customer Edge (CE) device may cause memory leak in the MPC which can cause an out of memory and MPC restarts. When this issue occurs, there will be temporary traffic interruption until the MPC is restored. An administrator can use the following CLI command to monitor the status of memory usage level of the MPC: user@device> show system resource-monitor fpc FPC Resource Usage Summary Free Heap Mem Watermark : 20 % Free NH Mem Watermark : 20 % Free Filter Mem Watermark : 20 % * – Watermark reached Slot # % Heap Free RTT Average RTT 1 87 PFE # % ENCAP mem Free % NH mem Free % FW mem Free 0 NA 88 99 1 NA 89 99 When the issue is occurring, the value of “% NH mem Free” will go down until the MPC restarts. This issue affects MX Series and EX9200 Series with Trio-based PFEs (Packet Forwarding Engines). Please refer to https://kb.juniper.net/KB25385 for the list of Trio-based PFEs. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series, EX9200 Series: 17.3R3-S8; 17.4R3-S2; 18.2R3-S4, 18.2R3-S5; 18.3R3-S2, 18.3R3-S3; 18.4 versions starting from 18.4R3-S1 and later versions prior to 18.4R3-S6; 19.2 versions starting from 19.2R2 and later versions prior to 19.2R3-S1; 19.4 versions starting from 19.4R2 and later versions prior to 19.4R2-S3, 19.4R3; 20.2 versions starting from 20.2R1 and later versions prior to 20.2R1-S3, 20.2R2. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS: 18.1, 19.1, 19.3, 20.1. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0202
CONFIRM

juniper_networks — space_network_management_platform

The Junos Space Network Management Platform has been found to store shared secrets in a recoverable format that can be exposed through the UI. An attacker who is able to execute arbitrary code in the victim browser (for example via XSS) or access cached contents may be able to obtain a copy of credentials managed by Junos Space. The impact of a successful attack includes, but is not limited to, obtaining access to other servers connected to the Junos Space Management Platform. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos Space versions prior to 20.3R1. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0220
CONFIRM jupyterhub — jupyterhub
JupyterHub 1.1.0 allows CSRF in the admin panel via a request that lacks an _xsrf field, as demonstrated by a /hub/api/user request (to add or remove a user account). 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-36191
MISC
MISC linux — linux_kernel
In drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c in the Linux kernel before 5.10.7, insufficient identifier checking in the LIO SCSI target code can be used by remote attackers to read or write files via directory traversal in an XCOPY request, aka CID-2896c93811e3. For example, an attack can occur over a network if the attacker has access to one iSCSI LUN. The attacker gains control over file access because I/O operations are proxied via an attacker-selected backstore. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-28374
MLIST
MLIST
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
FEDORA
FEDORA loxone — miniserver Loxone Miniserver devices with firmware before 11.1 (aka 11.1.9.3) are unable to use an authentication method that is based on the “signature of the update package.” Therefore, these devices (or attackers who are spoofing these devices) can continue to use an unauthenticated cloud service for an indeterminate time period (possibly forever). Once an individual device’s firmware is updated, and authentication occurs once, the cloud service recategorizes the device so that authentication is subsequently always required, and spoofing cannot occur. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-27488
MISC
MISC
MISC
MISC m2crypto — m2crypto
A flaw was found in all released versions of m2crypto, where they are vulnerable to Bleichenbacher timing attacks in the RSA decryption API via the timed processing of valid PKCS#1 v1.5 Ciphertext. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-25657
MISC malwarebytes — malwarebytes
An issue was discovered in Malwarebytes before 4.0 on macOS. A malicious application was able to perform a privileged action within the Malwarebytes launch daemon. The privileged service improperly validated XPC connections by relying on the PID instead of the audit token. An attacker can construct a situation where the same PID is used for running two different programs at different times, by leveraging a race condition during crafted use of posix_spawn. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-25533
MISC microsoft — azure_kubernetes_service Azure Active Directory Pod Identity Spoofing Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1677
MISC microsoft — edge_(edgehtml-based) Microsoft Edge (HTML-based) Memory Corruption Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1705
MISC microsoft — multiple_products Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1651. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1680
MISC microsoft — multiple_products Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1711
MISC microsoft — multiple_sharepoint_products Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1707
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Projected File System FS Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1663, CVE-2021-1672. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1670
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1661
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1662
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Projected File System FS Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1670, CVE-2021-1672. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1663
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1681, CVE-2021-1687, CVE-2021-1690. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1686
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1665
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1658, CVE-2021-1660, CVE-2021-1664, CVE-2021-1667, CVE-2021-1671, CVE-2021-1673, CVE-2021-1700, CVE-2021-1701. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1666
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1658, CVE-2021-1660, CVE-2021-1664, CVE-2021-1666, CVE-2021-1671, CVE-2021-1673, CVE-2021-1700, CVE-2021-1701. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1667
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Microsoft DTV-DVD Video Decoder Remote Code Execution Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1668
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1658, CVE-2021-1660, CVE-2021-1666, CVE-2021-1667, CVE-2021-1671, CVE-2021-1673, CVE-2021-1700, CVE-2021-1701. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1664
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Bluetooth Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1638, CVE-2021-1684. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1683
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products TPM Device Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1656
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1658, CVE-2021-1660, CVE-2021-1664, CVE-2021-1666, CVE-2021-1667, CVE-2021-1673, CVE-2021-1700, CVE-2021-1701. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1671
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows AppX Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1642. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1685
MISC
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1686, CVE-2021-1687, CVE-2021-1690. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1681
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1682
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products NTLM Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1678
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows NT Lan Manager Datagram Receiver Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1676
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Remote Desktop Protocol Core Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1674
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1658, CVE-2021-1660, CVE-2021-1664, CVE-2021-1666, CVE-2021-1667, CVE-2021-1671, CVE-2021-1700, CVE-2021-1701. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1673
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Bluetooth Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1638, CVE-2021-1683. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1684
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1660, CVE-2021-1664, CVE-2021-1666, CVE-2021-1667, CVE-2021-1671, CVE-2021-1673, CVE-2021-1700, CVE-2021-1701. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1658
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows CryptoAPI Denial of Service Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1679
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1680. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1651
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1658, CVE-2021-1660, CVE-2021-1664, CVE-2021-1666, CVE-2021-1667, CVE-2021-1671, CVE-2021-1673, CVE-2021-1700. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1701
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Remote Desktop Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1669
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1696
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1695
MISC
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1652, CVE-2021-1653, CVE-2021-1654, CVE-2021-1655, CVE-2021-1659, CVE-2021-1688. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1693
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Update Stack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1694
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1681, CVE-2021-1686, CVE-2021-1687. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1690
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1692. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1691
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1691. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1692
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Projected File System FS Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1663, CVE-2021-1670. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1672
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows (modem.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1699
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows InstallService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1697
MISC
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Remote Procedure Call Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1702
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Event Logging Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1703
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1704
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows LUAFV Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1706
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows GDI+ Information Disclosure Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1708
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1681, CVE-2021-1686, CVE-2021-1690. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1687
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1709
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1710
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1652, CVE-2021-1653, CVE-2021-1654, CVE-2021-1655, CVE-2021-1659, CVE-2021-1693. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1688
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Windows Multipoint Management Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1689
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1658, CVE-2021-1660, CVE-2021-1664, CVE-2021-1666, CVE-2021-1667, CVE-2021-1671, CVE-2021-1673, CVE-2021-1701. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1700
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products
Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1652, CVE-2021-1653, CVE-2021-1654, CVE-2021-1655, CVE-2021-1688, CVE-2021-1693. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1659
MISC microsoft — multiple_windows_products
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1658, CVE-2021-1664, CVE-2021-1666, CVE-2021-1667, CVE-2021-1671, CVE-2021-1673, CVE-2021-1700, CVE-2021-1701. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1660
MISC microsoft — sharepoint_foundation_2010 Microsoft SharePoint Server Tampering Vulnerability 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1718
MISC

microsoft — sharepoint_server_2019_and_sharepoint_enterprise_server_2016

Microsoft SharePoint Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-1712. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1719
MISC mubu — mubu Mubu 2.2.1 allows local users to gain privileges to execute commands, aka CNVD-2020-68878. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3134
MISC
MISC nagios — nagios_xi An issue was discovered in the Manage Plugins page in Nagios XI before 5.8.0. Because the line-ending conversion feature is mishandled during a plugin upload, a remote, authenticated admin user can execute operating-system commands. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-35578
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM nec — multiple_products
Multiple NEC products (Express5800/T110j, Express5800/T110j-S, Express5800/T110j (2nd-Gen), Express5800/T110j-S (2nd-Gen), iStorage NS100Ti, and Express5800/GT110j) where Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) firmware Rev1.09 and earlier is applied allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and then obtain/modify BMC setting information, obtain monitoring information, or reboot/shut down the vulnerable product via unspecified vectors. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-5633
MISC
MISC
MISC nec — univerge_sv9500_and_sv8500_sercies
Incorrect implementation of authentication algorithm issue in UNIVERGE SV9500 series from V1 to V7and SV8500 series from S6 to S8 allows an attacker to access the remote system maintenance feature and obtain the information by sending a specially crafted request to a specific URL. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-5686
MISC
MISC nec — univerge_sv9500_and_sv8500_sercies
UNIVERGE SV9500 series from V1 to V7and SV8500 series from S6 to S8 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands or cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition by sending a specially crafted request to a specific URL. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-5685
MISC
MISC onedev — onedev
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, there is a critical vulnerability which can lead to pre-auth remote code execution. AttachmentUploadServlet deserializes untrusted data from the `Attachment-Support` header. This Servlet does not enforce any authentication or authorization checks. This issue may lead to pre-auth remote code execution. This issue was fixed in 4.0.3 by removing AttachmentUploadServlet and not using deserialization 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21242
MISC
CONFIRM onedev — onedev
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, a Kubernetes REST endpoint exposes two methods that deserialize untrusted data from the request body. These endpoints do not enforce any authentication or authorization checks. This issue may lead to pre-auth RCE. This issue was fixed in 4.0.3 by not using deserialization at KubernetesResource side. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21243
MISC
CONFIRM onedev — onedev
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, the REST UserResource endpoint performs a security check to make sure that only administrators can list user details. However for the `/users/{id}` endpoint there are no security checks enforced so it is possible to retrieve arbitrary user details including their Access Tokens! These access tokens can be used to access the API or clone code in the build spec via the HTTP(S) protocol. It has permissions to all projects accessible by the user account. This issue may lead to `Sensitive data leak` and leak the Access Token which can be used to impersonate the administrator or any other users. This issue was addressed in 4.0.3 by removing user info from restful api. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21246
MISC
CONFIRM onedev — onedev
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, AttachmentUploadServlet also saves user controlled data (`request.getInputStream()`) to a user specified location (`request.getHeader(“File-Name”)`). This issue may lead to arbitrary file upload which can be used to upload a WebShell to OneDev server. This issue is addressed in 4.0.3 by only allowing uploaded file to be in attachments folder. The webshell issue is not possible as OneDev never executes files in attachments folder. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21245
MISC
CONFIRM onedev — onedev
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, There is a vulnerability that enabled pre-auth server side template injection via Bean validation message tampering. Full details in the reference GHSA. This issue was fixed in 4.0.3 by disabling validation interpolation completely. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21244
MISC
CONFIRM onedev — onedev
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, the application’s BasePage registers an AJAX event listener (`AbstractPostAjaxBehavior`) in all pages other than the login page. This listener decodes and deserializes the `data` query parameter. We can access this listener by submitting a POST request to any page. This issue may lead to `post-auth RCE` This endpoint is subject to authentication and, therefore, requires a valid user to carry on the attack. This issue was addressed in 4.0.3 by encrypting serialization payload with secrets only known to server. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21247
CONFIRM onedev — onedev
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, there is a critical vulnerability involving the build endpoint parameters. InputSpec is used to define parameters of a Build spec. It does so by using dynamically generated Groovy classes. A user able to control job parameters can run arbitrary code on OneDev’s server by injecting arbitrary Groovy code. The ultimate result is in the injection of a static constructor that will run arbitrary code. For a full example refer to the referenced GHSA. This issue was addressed in 4.0.3 by escaping special characters such as quote from user input. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21248
MISC
CONFIRM onedev — onedev
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, there is an issue involving YAML parsing which can lead to post-auth remote code execution. In order to parse and process YAML files, OneDev uses SnakeYaml which by default (when not using `SafeConstructor`) allows the instantiation of arbitrary classes. We can leverage that to run arbitrary code by instantiating classes such as `javax.script.ScriptEngineManager` and using `URLClassLoader` to load the script engine provider, resulting in the instantiation of a user controlled class. For a full example refer to the referenced GHSA. This issue was addressed in 4.0.3 by only allowing certain known classes to be deserialized 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21249
MISC
CONFIRM onedev — onedev
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, there is a critical vulnerability which may lead to arbitrary file read. When BuildSpec is provided in XML format, the spec is processed by XmlBuildSpecMigrator.migrate(buildSpecString); which processes the XML document without preventing the expansion of external entities. These entities can be configured to read arbitrary files from the file system and dump their contents in the final XML document to be migrated. If the files are dumped in properties included in the YAML file, it will be possible for an attacker to read them. If not, it is possible for an attacker to exfiltrate the contents of these files Out Of Band. This issue was addressed in 4.0.3 by ignoring ENTITY instructions in xml file. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21250
MISC
CONFIRM onedev — onedev
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3 there is a critical “zip slip” vulnerability. This issue may lead to arbitrary file write. The KubernetesResource REST endpoint untars user controlled data from the request body using TarUtils. TarUtils is a custom library method leveraging Apache Commons Compress. During the untar process, there are no checks in place to prevent an untarred file from traversing the file system and overriding an existing file. For a successful exploitation, the attacker requires a valid __JobToken__ which may not be possible to get without using any of the other reported vulnerabilities. But this should be considered a vulnerability in `io.onedev.commons.utils.TarUtils` since it lives in a different artifact and can affect other projects using it. This issue was addressed in 4.0.3 by validating paths in tar archive to only allow them to be in specified folder when extracted. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21251
CONFIRM open-iscsi — tcmu-runner
In Open-iSCSI tcmu-runner 1.3.x, 1.4.x, and 1.5.x through 1.5.2, xcopy_locate_udev in tcmur_cmd_handler.c lacks a check for transport-layer restrictions, allowing remote attackers to read or write files via directory traversal in an XCOPY request. For example, an attack can occur over a network if the attacker has access to one iSCSI LUN. NOTE: relative to CVE-2020-28374, this is a similar mistake in a different algorithm. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3139
MLIST
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM
MISC opera — opera_mini_for_android Opera Mini for Android below 53.1 displays URL left-aligned in the address field. This allows a malicious attacker to craft a URL with a long domain name, e.g. www.safe.opera.com.attacker.com. With the URL being left-aligned, the user will only see the front part (e.g. www.safe.opera.com…) The exact amount depends on the phone screen size but the attacker can craft a number of different domains and target different phones. Starting with version 53.1 Opera Mini displays long URLs with the top-level domain label aligned to the right of the address field which mitigates the issue. 2021-01-11 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23253
CONFIRM owasp — json-sanitizer OWASP json-sanitizer before 1.2.2 can output invalid JSON or throw an undeclared exception for crafted input. This may lead to denial of service if the application is not prepared to handle these situations. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23900
MISC
MISC
MISC owasp — json-sanitizer OWASP json-sanitizer before 1.2.2 may emit closing SCRIPT tags and CDATA section delimiters for crafted input. This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTML or XML into embedding documents. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23899
MISC
MISC
MISC owncloud — owncloud ownCloud (Core) before 10.5 allows XSS in login page ‘forgot password.’ 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-16255
MISC
MISC palo_alto_networks — pan-os An information exposure through log file vulnerability exists in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software where configuration secrets for the “http”, “email”, and “snmptrap” v3 log forwarding server profiles can be logged to the logrcvr.log system log. Logged information may include up to 1024 bytes of the configuration including the username and password in an encrypted form and private keys used in any certificate profiles set for log forwarding server profiles. This issue impacts: PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.18; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.12; PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.4; PAN-OS 10.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 10.0.1. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3032
CONFIRM palo_alto_networks — pan-os Padding bytes in Ethernet packets on PA-200, PA-220, PA-500, PA-800, PA-2000 Series, PA-3000 Series, PA-3200 Series, PA-5200 Series, and PA-7000 Series firewalls are not cleared before the data frame is created. This leaks a small amount of random information from the firewall memory into the Ethernet packets. An attacker on the same Ethernet subnet as the PAN-OS firewall is able to collect potentially sensitive information from these packets. This issue is also known as Etherleak and is detected by security scanners as CVE-2003-0001. This issue impacts: PAN-OS 8.1 version earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.18; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.12; PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.5. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3031
CONFIRM python-cryptography — python-cryptography python-cryptography 3.2 is vulnerable to Bleichenbacher timing attacks in the RSA decryption API, via timed processing of valid PKCS#1 v1.5 ciphertext. 2021-01-11 not yet calculated CVE-2020-25659
MISC r-project — cran
The R programming language’s default package manager CRAN is affected by a path traversal vulnerability that can lead to server compromise. This vulnerability affects packages installed via the R CMD install cli command or the install.packages() function from the interpreter. Update to version 4.0.3 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-27637
MISC
MISC red_hat — single_sign_on The “Test Connection” available in v7.x of the Red Hat Single Sign On application console can permit an authorized user to cause SMTP connections to be attempted to arbitrary hosts and ports of the user’s choosing, and originating from the RHSSO installation. By observing differences in the timings of these scans, an attacker may glean information about hosts and ports which they do not have access to scan directly. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-14341
CONFIRM scalance — multiple_switches
A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X-200 switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions), SCALANCE X-200IRT switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions), SCALANCE X-300 switch family (incl. X408 and SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions < V4.1.0). The webserver of the affected devices contains a vulnerability that may lead to a heap overflow condition. An attacker could cause this condition on the webserver by sending specially crafted requests. This could stop the webserver temporarily. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-15800
MISC scalance — x-200_and_x-200irt_switches A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X-200 switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions), SCALANCE X-200IRT switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions). The web server of the affected devices contains a vulnerability that may lead to a buffer overflow condition. An attacker could cause this condition on the webserver by sending a specially crafted request. The webserver could stop and not recover anymore. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-25226
MISC scalance — x-200_and_x-200irt_switches
A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X-200 switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All Versions), SCALANCE X-200IRT switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions). Devices create a new unique key upon factory reset, except when used with C-PLUG. When used with C-PLUG the devices use the hardcoded private RSA-key shipped with the firmware-image. An attacker could leverage this situation to a man-in-the-middle situation and decrypt previously captured traffic. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-28391
MISC
MISC scalance — x-200_and_x200irt_switches
A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X-200 switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions), SCALANCE X-200IRT switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions). The vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated attacker to reboot the device over the network by using special urls from integrated web server of the affected products. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-15799
MISC scalance — x-300_swtiches
A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X-300 switch family (incl. X408 and SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions < V4.1.0). Devices do not create a new unique private key after factory reset. An attacker could leverage this situation to a man-in-the-middle situation and decrypt previously captured traffic. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-28395
MISC
MISC
MISC scully — scully This affects the package @scullyio/scully before 1.0.9. The transfer state is serialised with the JSON.stringify() function and then written into the HTML page. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-28470
MISC
MISC siemens — opcenter_execution_core A vulnerability has been identified in Opcenter Execution Core (V8.2), Opcenter Execution Core (V8.3). The application contains an information leakage vulnerability in the handling of web client sessions. A local attacker who has access to the Web Client Session Storage could disclose the passwords of currently logged-in users. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2020-28390
MISC
MISC simplecommerce — simplecommerce
SimplCommerce 1.0.0-rc uses the Bootbox.js library, which allows creation of programmatic dialog boxes using Bootstrap modals. The Bootbox.js library intentionally does not perform any sanitization of user input, which results in a DOM XSS, because it uses the jQuery .html() function to directly append the payload to a dialog. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29587
MISC sky — skysea_client_view Untrusted search path vulnerability in the installer of SKYSEA Client View Ver.1.020.05b to Ver.16.001.01g allows an attacker to gain privileges via a Trojan horse DLL in an unspecified directory. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-20616
MISC
MISC skyworth — gn542vf_boa Skyworth GN542VF Boa version 0.94.13 does not set the Secure flag for the session cookie in an HTTPS session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an HTTP session. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-26732
MISC skyworth — gn542vf_hardware Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Configuration page in SKYWORTH GN542VF Hardware Version 2.0 and Software Version 2.0.0.16 allows authenticated attacker to inject their own script into the page via DDNS Configuration Section. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-26733
MISC solarwinds — web_help_desk
SolarWinds Web Help Desk 12.7.0 allows XSS via a Schedule Name. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2019-16961
MISC
MISC
MISC sound_research — dchu
The SECOMN service in Sound Research DCHU model software component modules (APO) through 2.0.9.17, delivered on HP Windows 10 computers, may allow escalation of privilege via a fake DLL. (As a resolution, Windows Update is being submitted for all affected products to update to 2.0.9.18 or later.) 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-35686
MISC sudo — sudo
The sudoedit personality of Sudo before 1.9.5 may allow a local unprivileged user to perform arbitrary directory-existence tests by winning a sudo_edit.c race condition in replacing a user-controlled directory by a symlink to an arbitrary path. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23239
MISC
CONFIRM thingworx — multiple_products
KEPServerEX v6.0 to v6.9, ThingWorx Kepware Server v6.8 and v6.9, ThingWorx Industrial Connectivity (all versions), OPC-Aggregator (all versions), Rockwell Automation KEPServer Enterprise, GE Digital Industrial Gateway Server v7.68.804 and v7.66, and Software Toolbox TOP Server all 6.x versions, are vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow. Opening a specifically crafted OPC UA message could allow an attacker to crash the server and potentially leak data. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-27267
MISC thingworx — multiple_products
KEPServerEX: v6.0 to v6.9, ThingWorx Kepware Server: v6.8 and v6.9, ThingWorx Industrial Connectivity: All versions, OPC-Aggregator: All versions, Rockwell Automation KEPServer Enterprise, GE Digital Industrial Gateway Server: v7.68.804 and v7.66, Software Toolbox TOP Server: All 6.x versions are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. Opening a specifically crafted OPC UA message could allow an attacker to crash the server and remotely execute code. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-27265
MISC thingworx — multiple_products
KEPServerEX: v6.0 to v6.9, ThingWorx Kepware Server: v6.8 and v6.9, ThingWorx Industrial Connectivity: All versions, OPC-Aggregator: All versions, Rockwell Automation KEPServer Enterprise, GE Digital Industrial Gateway Server: v7.68.804 and v7.66, Software Toolbox TOP Server: All 6.x versions, are vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow. Opening a specifically crafted OPC UA message could allow an attacker to crash the server and potentially leak data. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-27263
MISC thinkadmin — thinkadmin
An insecure unserialize vulnerability was discovered in ThinkAdmin versions 4.x through 6.x in app/admin/controller/api/Update.php and app/wechat/controller/api/Push.php, which may lead to arbitrary remote code execution. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-23653
MISC totolink — a702r_router
Directory Indexing in Login Portal of Login Portal of TOTOLINK-A702R-V1.0.0-B20161227.1023 allows attacker to access /icons/ directories via GET Parameter. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2020-27368
MISC wordpress — wordpress The Elementor Contact Form DB plugin before 1.6 for WordPress allows CSRF via backend admin pages. 2021-01-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3133
MISC
MISC wordpress — wordpress
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in models/list-table.php in the FV Flowplayer Video Player plugin before 7.4.37.727 for WordPress allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the fv_wp_fvvideoplayer_src JSON field in the data parameter. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-35748
MISC
MISC wordpress — wordpress
Directory traversal vulnerability in class-simple_job_board_resume_download_handler.php in the Simple Board Job plugin 2.9.3 and earlier for WordPress allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the sjb_file parameter to wp-admin/post.php. 2021-01-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-35749
MISC xiaomi — ax1800rom_and_rm1800_routers The login verification can be bypassed by using the problem that the time is not synchronized after the router restarts. This affects Xiaomi router AX1800rom version < 1.0.336 and Xiaomi route RM1800 root version < 1.0.26. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-14098
MISC xiaomi — ax1800rom_and_rm1800_routers
There is command injection when ddns processes the hostname, which causes the administrator user to obtain the root privilege of the router. This affects Xiaomi router AX1800rom version < 1.0.336 and Xiaomi route RM1800 root version < 1.0.26. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-14102
MISC xiaomi — ax1800rom_and_rm1800_routers
The data collection SDK of the router web management interface caused the leakage of the token. This affects Xiaomi router AX1800rom version < 1.0.336 and Xiaomi route RM1800 root version < 1.0.26. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-14101
MISC xiaomi — ax6_rom_router Wrong nginx configuration, causing specific paths to be downloaded without authorization. This affects Xiaomi router AX6 ROM version < 1.0.18. 2021-01-13 not yet calculated CVE-2020-14097
MISC zte — smart_stb A ZTE Smart STB is impacted by an information leak vulnerability. The device did not fully verify the log, so attackers could use this vulnerability to obtain sensitive user information for further information detection and attacks. This affects: ZXV10 B860A V2.1-T_V0032.1.1.04_jiangsuTelecom. 2021-01-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21722
MISC

Experiencing Alerting failure for Metric Alerts – 01/18 – Resolved

by Contributed | Jan 18, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Final Update: Monday, 18 January 2021 11:30 UTC

We’ve confirmed that all systems are back to normal with no customer impact as of 01/18, 11:00 UTC. Our logs show the incident started on 01/18, 10:00 UTC and that during the 1 hour that it took to resolve the issue some customers may have experienced missing or misfired alerts in East US region while using Azure Metric Alert Rules.

Root Cause: The failure was due to a recent deployment task

Incident Timeline: 1Hour & 0 minutes – 01/18, 10:00 UTC through 01/18, 11:00 UTC

We understand that customers rely on Metric Alerts as a critical service and apologize for any impact this incident caused.

-Deepika

Periscope up – what's on the horizon for hybrid event

by Contributed | Jan 18, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Now we let the cat out of the bag that we’re putting on an event on Feb 2nd, 2021 – it’s time to go a little deeper. How about some information about the AWESOME content we have lined up that is being created RIGHT NOW, just for you. In case you missed the previous post where I talked about the concept of what we’re trying to do, make sure you go back and read it before continuing.

Our focus for this iteration of IT Ops Talks is “All Things Hybrid”. We took some time to debate this out as a team and vet it with some folks in the community and in our internal networks. We’re challenging folks creating this first round of content with how their technical session will be relevant to a Hybrid world of on-prem and in the cloud – but also with its relevancy for making your on-prem world better. This post is going to cover the top level details of what specific topics will be covered AND who we’ve lined up from the engineering teams to create / deliver them! Think of this as your initial content catalogue of what to expect on the 2nd with even more details to come.

I have to give a shout out and say THANK YOU to the Experts / Engineers and everyday Microsofties who are trusting us to help them share their content in this format on such short notice. This list is our first cut at assembling the bulk of the content being created for YOU in this new format. Have a read through to the end of the post and let us know what you think!

Securing your Hybrid environment Part 1 – Azure Security Center

Sarah Young (@_sarahyo) – Sr. Program Manager

Now more than ever, organizations are challenged with keeping their employees productive working remotely and interacting with their customers over digital channels. At the same time there has been an increase in evolving digital security threats as bad actors recognize an opportunity to disrupt your business. Moreover, security resources are stretched, and prioritization is important.

Securing your Hybrid environment Part 2 – Azure Sentinel

Sarah Young (@_sarahyo) – Sr. Program Manager

Sit down with Azure Sentinel Sr. PM Sarah Young to discuss new features, functionality, and best practices on harnessing the AI enabled security solution.

Securing SMB from within and without

Ned Pyle (@nerdPyle) – Principal Program Manager

Learn specific strategies to secure SMB from lateral movement and external interception attacks! Watch interesting demos of the steps you can take to protect your organization! See the often unpredictable Ned Pyle struggle to be professional on camera!

Virtualized and Hybrid Backup Deep Dive (to be confirmed)

Ben Armstrong (@vBenArmstrong) – Principal Program Manager

Ben Armstrong does a deep dive on Virtualized and Hybrid Backup

How to be an AD Hybrid Health Hero

Mark Morowczynski (@markmorow) – Principal Program Manager

Grace Picking – Program Manager

Once you’ve connected your identity to Azure AD, how do you ensure it continues to function as expected? In this session, you’ll learn how to keep your hybrid identity environment healthy, across different Active Directory and Azure Active Directory scenarios.

Windows Server Hybrid Deep Dive (to be confirmed)

Jeff Woolsey (@WSV_GUY)- Principal Program Manager

Jeff goes in-depth with how Windows Server works in hybrid scenarios with Azure integration.

Windows Authentication Internals in a Hybrid World

Steve Syfuhs (@SteveSyfuhs) – Senior Software Engineer

Have you ever wondered what happens when you type your password into Windows? With the cloud becoming a major part of our world, we find ourselves having to talk to both on-premises and cloud-native resources, which dramatically affects what happens when you do type your password into Windows. Follow along as Steve Syfuhs gives a guided tour of how Windows handles logons internally and secures your authentication in a hybrid world.

Getting started with Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) on Azure Stack HCI

Matt McSpirit (@mattmcspirit) – Senior Program Manager

In this session, you’ll learn about the new Azure Kubernetes Service on Azure Stack HCI, how you can use it to run your containerized Windows and Linux apps, how it integrates with Azure, and how it provides the best platform to run additional Azure services, including Arc-enabled Data Services. This will help you to modernize your existing applications on our Azure Stack HCI Hybrid Cloud Platform

Windows Virtual Desktop Road Map Deep Dive

Tom Hickling (@tomhickling) – WVD Global Black Belt

Dive into the forthcoming WVD roadmap and how it can help be part of your hybrid cloud strategy.

Learn the 5 key areas to consider for your hybrid workloads

David Kurth (@TheDaveKurth) – Senior Product Marketing Manager

In this whiteboard session (after a few slides for context), we will discuss the 5 key areas of any hybrid cloud workload, connectivity, application, data, identity, security & management.

Azure Stack HCI Hybrid is built-in: How does it really work?

Kerim Hanif (@kerimhanif) – Senior Program Manager

Ready to deploy Azure Stack HCI, the new hyperconverged infrastructure operating system delivered as an Azure service? Join this session to learn everything you need to know about how Azure Stack HCI’s hybrid connectivity works. Is it hard to register? (Hint: no.) Is there an agent? (Hint: no.) Does Azure see my VMs and their data? (Hint: no.) Do I need to open my firewall to freely allow Internet traffic? (Hint: no.) All these answers and more.

From WS2008 to Azure with containers – An Ops view on how to modernize existing applications with Windows Admin Center

Vinicius Apolinario (@vrapolinario) – Senior Program Manager

ITPros around the globe are trying to figure out how to modernize existing applications. End of Support for Windows Server 2008, how to move applications to the cloud, and how to leverage new technologies such as Kubernetes have become a daunting process for Ops teams. In this session we will cover how to containerize existing applications from the perspective of an ITPro. We will use tools that you are used to – such as Windows Admin Center to jumpstart your modernization process and show how to move an application from Windows Server 2008 to Azure Kubernetes Service.

Governing baselines such as STIG in hybrid server environments using Azure Policy Guest Configuration

Michael Greene (@migreene) – Principal Program Manager

Learn to use services in Azure to audit the state of servers across private and public clouds and upcoming plans to expand capabilities in this area.

Log Analytics workspace design deep dive

Meir Mendelovich (@MMendelovich) – Principal Program Manager

in this session we will cover

Proper Workspace design: resource-centric and RBAC.

Resource-centric alerts.

Enterprise features: Dedicated cluster, high scale, AZ, DE, CMK

OneAgent, Query Packs and infrastructure as code

Workspace data Export and proper data placement

Workspace Optimization

Monitoring and Responding to alerts in hybrid environments using Azure Monitor

Erik Namtvedt (@ErikN_MSFT) – Senior Service Engineer

A deep dive of the framework Microsoft Retail has leveraged over the last 3-4 years to monitor all their on-prem system, including in-store Video walls and others. It’s based on Azure Public-Offering technologies. It leverages Application Insights, OMS (SCOM too), Log Analytics, Azure Storage (Blob/Tables), Azure Automation, and PowerShell.

PowerShell Deep dive

Joey Aiello (@joeyaiello) – Senior Program Manager

We will use this time to take a deep dive on migratingadapting old PowerShell scripts from previous versions and making them work in PowerShell 7 and PowerShell Core.
We’ll also take a serious look at secret management with PowerShell to avoid the ever annoying problem of hardcode creds or use prompts.

Deep dive on Onboarding customers into Lighthouse

Archana Balakrishnan (@Archun0505) – Principal Program Manager

In this session we will demystify the intricacies of onboarding customers in Azure Lighthouse from a service provider’s perspective

Databases are cattle too! Running highly available databases consistently on any infrastructure using Arc data services

Travis Wright (@radtravis) – Principal Group Program Manager

Have you heard people say ‘containers or Kubernetes is not for databases’? Let me show you how that is definitely not the case in 2021. Kubernetes provides an abstraction layer over any infrastructure and an orchestration engine that powers Arc enabled data services so DevOps, DBAs, and developers can provision and manage highly available SQL and PostrgreSQL database instances on any infrastructure – on-prem, AWS, or Google. In this session, I’ll dive deep into the technical weeds with nearly 100% demos that show you exactly how it all works and you can manage it all with GUI, CLI, Azure-native tools, or Kubernetes-native tools.

Event Hub on Azure Stack Overview

Manoj Prasad () – Program Manager

Javier Fernandez (@JavierF08160601) – Senior Program Manager

Provide an overview of Event Hub on Azure Stack and highlight why Event Hub is a great offering on Azure Stack for customers.

Modernize how you manage hybrid servers with Azure Arc

Ryan Puffer () – Senior Program Manager

Think the cloud is just for things that are…in the cloud? Come learn how you can use Azure Arc to simplify IT operations across your entire fleet, no matter where your servers run. We’ll start with a deep dive into the architecture and benefits of Azure Arc followed by a demonstration of how Azure Arc can help you monitor, secure, and simplify management of a multi-tier on-premises application.

Like the sound of all that? How do you get to the content?!

Part of our content plan is to release a full length detailed blog post for EACH of these sessions that will contain specific “deep links” to all the resources, links to docs, links to Microsoft Learn modules so you can dive in and learn even more about the topics and possibly setup some hands on experiences for yourself. When each session goes live – it will have details on how to interact with the presenters and other experts from the community who are interested in the topic with a special “hallway conversation” area on our teams Discord Server.

To find the blog posts for all of these sessions, keep an eye on https://aka.ms/ITOpsTalks on our Feb 2 release date.

Want to get started earlier and talk about this event? Join our work friendly IT Ops Talk Discord server today!

« Older Entries

Next Entries »

Log Analytics UI – New experience for Agents Configuration

Intro

The new Agents configuration blade

Feedback

CloudEvents for Azure EventGrid via Azure Functions

Installing Azure EventGrid SDK Preview

Sending Event Data in CloudEvents Format

Receiving Event Data in CloudEvents Format

Responding Event Handler Validation Requests

Handling Event Data

Vulnerability Summary for the Week of January 11, 2021

Experiencing Alerting failure for Metric Alerts – 01/18 – Resolved

Periscope up – what's on the horizon for hybrid event

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Meta

We look forward to meeting you